Anyway, the long and short of the shot was that he used to flip himself upside down and play with the ball over the edge of the toy. I caught him at it one day and was fast enough with the camera to get a decent looking shot (no paw over his face, no motion blur, etc.) What really makes this picture work is that I got as close to his level as possible, with the camera practically resting on the floor in front of him.
If you ask anyone that's tried to take pictures of a black animal, they'll tell you that it is EXTREMELY hard to get something that looks like more than a featureless silhouette. (One photographer was quoted as saying that the only way to get a decent picture of your black dog was to get a grey dog.) This shot was taken so long ago that I can't for the life of me remember what the lighting was like, but I do know there was a bank of windows to the left of the frame, and the overhead light to the right was probably on. Long and short, I got lucky, and even then his front legs tend to lose detail.
Compare that to the 'unaltered' shot, which I only desaturated ('made black-and-white,' for you lay folk).
Ok, so at this size differences really aren't that blatant, but if you look at the toy and the edges/corners you can tell where I "dodged" the print, and if you look really carefully you can see that the background has been blurred out a little more. Contrast was increased a little as well, although you can't see that very well when they're this small.
ReplyDelete